Listings and Pendings as of February 1, 2011
/February 1,2011
As usual I am posting the number of active listings and properties in escrow as reported in the CRMLS on February 1, 2011.
Banning/Beaumont......List/626........Pend/191.......Back-up/61.......Ratio/.403
Bloomington..................List/72...........Pend/60........Back-up/14.......Ratio/1.028
Colton.............................List/154........Pend/81.........Back-up/25.......Ratio/.688
Fontana..........................List/862.......Pend/475.......Back-up/144.....Ratio/.718
Grand Terrace..............List/29..........Pend/14.........Back-up/4.........Ratio/.621
Highland........................List/218.........Pend/94........Back-up/27.......Ratio/.555
Loma Linda...................List/62..........Pend/23.........Back-up/9.........Ratio/.516
Mentone........................List/29..........Pend/13.........Back-up/6.........Ratio/.655
Moreno Valley..............List/951........Pend/466.......Back-up/151....Ratio/.649
Redlands.......................List/304........Pend/78.........Back-up/47.......Ratio/.411
Rialto.............................List/387........Pend/204.......Back-up/57.......Ratio/.674
Riverside......................List/1484......Pend/628.......Back-up/278.....Ratio/.611
San Bernardino............List/868........Pend/391.......Back-up/111.....Ratio/.578
Yucaipa/Calimesa.......List/256.........Pend/91.........Back-up/50......Ratio/.551
There are the numbers for February 1, 2011. It is interesting to me to note that the ratios are in the most consistent range that they have been since I started tracking them. As 2011 progresses, it will be interesting to see if these ratios continue. If you remember, the ratios for 2010 were quite widely spread from 1.100 to .28. Perhaps these are the ratios that are consistent with a market that is neither "HOT" OR "COLD".
As usual I am posting the number of active listings and properties in escrow as reported in the CRMLS on February 1, 2011.
Banning/Beaumont......List/626........Pend/191.......Back-up/61.......Ratio/.403
Bloomington..................List/72...........Pend/60........Back-up/14.......Ratio/1.028
Colton.............................List/154........Pend/81.........Back-up/25.......Ratio/.688
Fontana..........................List/862.......Pend/475.......Back-up/144.....Ratio/.718
Grand Terrace..............List/29..........Pend/14.........Back-up/4.........Ratio/.621
Highland........................List/218.........Pend/94........Back-up/27.......Ratio/.555
Loma Linda...................List/62..........Pend/23.........Back-up/9.........Ratio/.516
Mentone........................List/29..........Pend/13.........Back-up/6.........Ratio/.655
Moreno Valley..............List/951........Pend/466.......Back-up/151....Ratio/.649
Redlands.......................List/304........Pend/78.........Back-up/47.......Ratio/.411
Rialto.............................List/387........Pend/204.......Back-up/57.......Ratio/.674
Riverside......................List/1484......Pend/628.......Back-up/278.....Ratio/.611
San Bernardino............List/868........Pend/391.......Back-up/111.....Ratio/.578
Yucaipa/Calimesa.......List/256.........Pend/91.........Back-up/50......Ratio/.551
There are the numbers for February 1, 2011. It is interesting to me to note that the ratios are in the most consistent range that they have been since I started tracking them. As 2011 progresses, it will be interesting to see if these ratios continue. If you remember, the ratios for 2010 were quite widely spread from 1.100 to .28. Perhaps these are the ratios that are consistent with a market that is neither "HOT" OR "COLD".
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home