Median Prices -January 2011 and Last January
February 9, 2011
Without considering the fluctuations in median prices for 2010, here are just two numbers - the median price for January 2011 and the median price for January 2010. To me the numbers show a market that has found a bottom and is waiting for supply and demand to determine its next direction.
Banning/Beaumont......January,2011/170,000......January,2010/171,500
Bloomington.................January,2011/165,000.......January,2010/135,000
Colton...........................January,2011/93.000.........January,2010/100,000
Fontana........................Janaury,2011/194,500.......January,2010/195,000
Grand Terrace.............January,2011/203,000......January,2010/236,000
Highland......................January,2011/162,000......January,2010/163,500
Loma Linda.................January,2011/250,000......January,2010/275,000
Mentone......................January,2011/157,000.......January,2010/200,000
Moreno Valley............Janaury,2011/150,000.......January,2010/150,000
Redlands.....................January,2011/217,900.......January,2010/212,500
Rialto..........................January,2011/160,000.......Janaury,2010/142,000
Riverside....................January,2011/189,000.......January,2010/185,500
San Bernardino.........January,2011/120,000.......Janaury, 2010/95,000
Yucaipa/Calimesa.....Janaury,2011/195,000.......January,2010/177,000
Just a reminder. These numbers are obtained from the CRMLS by taking the total number of closed single family home transactions, dividing by two and using the sales price of the property at the number indicated by the division into halves.
The basic merit of this technique is that the formula is used consistently so that it does indicate at what price things are better or less than.
Without considering the fluctuations in median prices for 2010, here are just two numbers - the median price for January 2011 and the median price for January 2010. To me the numbers show a market that has found a bottom and is waiting for supply and demand to determine its next direction.
Banning/Beaumont......January,2011/170,000......January,2010/171,500
Bloomington.................January,2011/165,000.......January,2010/135,000
Colton...........................January,2011/93.000.........January,2010/100,000
Fontana........................Janaury,2011/194,500.......January,2010/195,000
Grand Terrace.............January,2011/203,000......January,2010/236,000
Highland......................January,2011/162,000......January,2010/163,500
Loma Linda.................January,2011/250,000......January,2010/275,000
Mentone......................January,2011/157,000.......January,2010/200,000
Moreno Valley............Janaury,2011/150,000.......January,2010/150,000
Redlands.....................January,2011/217,900.......January,2010/212,500
Rialto..........................January,2011/160,000.......Janaury,2010/142,000
Riverside....................January,2011/189,000.......January,2010/185,500
San Bernardino.........January,2011/120,000.......Janaury, 2010/95,000
Yucaipa/Calimesa.....Janaury,2011/195,000.......January,2010/177,000
Just a reminder. These numbers are obtained from the CRMLS by taking the total number of closed single family home transactions, dividing by two and using the sales price of the property at the number indicated by the division into halves.
The basic merit of this technique is that the formula is used consistently so that it does indicate at what price things are better or less than.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home